As downtown Phoenix continues to develop, residents and local businesses point out that growth comes with challenges.
Development in the area has been increasing for over a decade now, and it doesn’t show any sign of stopping. With the addition of new apartment complexes, student housing and condominium projects, more and more people are flocking to Arizona’s urban center.
Within the downtown redevelopment area, 1,185 apartment units have been completed so far in 2017. This area is roughly bounded by McDowell Road and Lincoln Street and Seventh Avenue and Seventh Street. Another 1,636 units are under construction, while 2,529 are in pre-development, according Dan Klocke, executive director of the Downtown Phoenix Partnership.
Within a one-mile radius of First Avenue and Monroe Street, downtown Phoenix has a population of just over 18,000 people. Since 2000, the population has increased by 12 percent, and is expected to increase by approximately another 8 percent in the next five years, according to the Downtown Phoenix Partnership and CoStar Group.
Depending on the number of bedrooms, the price for the new units range from approximately $1,000 to $2,200 per month, according to Klocke.
Unintended Consequences
Among those moving downtown are young professionals and college students attending Arizona State University’s Downtown Phoenix Campus and University of Arizona’s Phoenix Biomedical Campus. Klocke said that it appears that young professionals are the driving force of the movement.
“At the same time, other people are getting pushed out of downtown because the pricing has gone up so much that it’s not as affordable as it once was,” said Kimber Lanning, founder and executive director of Local First Arizona.
Sarah Bingham, co-owner of the vintage clothing shop Antique Sugar, lived downtown for close to 10 years, and recently sold her condo because its value went up so much.
“Anybody who wasn’t fortunate enough to buy a place when it was cheap can’t really afford to live here anymore,” Bingham said. “Most people that have been here for this long probably won’t agree that this growth is a good thing.”
She said that preserving the authenticity of downtown has also raised concerns.
“There’s going to be a lot of battles over saving older buildings. Developers can’t find any dirt, so they’re going to want to tear down what’s already there,” Lanning said. “That’s going to be an environmental disaster and a cultural disaster because a lot of those older buildings provide the unique character and sense of place.”
Lanning said that newer buildings, especially along Roosevelt Street, lack this character. She said that though ASU has done a good job of preserving Phoenix’s historic buildings, the expansion of the nation’s largest university to downtown has also attracted the attention of developers who don’t care about the individuality of the area.
Bingham agreed that though the growth has been positive economically, it has not been as great for the arts surrounding Roosevelt, with some art venues turning into restaurants and bars.
“It’s definitely not as vibrant as it used to be,” Bingham said.
Art galleries and smaller retailers can’t pay rent, allowing the spaces to be taken over by bars and restaurants that are more likely to be able to afford the higher costs, Lanning said.
She said that the new apartments popping up are affecting the walkability of the district.
New buildings are required to have ground floor retail in order to maintain the pedestrian-friendly aspect of the area. However, developers have realized that putting a gym on the ground floor of an apartment building is a way to get around the system and meet the requirement, Lanning said.
“When you take an arts district like Roosevelt Row, and you put up five apartment complexes that have gymnasiums on the ground floor, it’s completely devastating,” Lanning said. “We need to have a very public conversation about not allowing huge leasing suites facing our most walkable district.”
Balancing Benefits
Steve Yozwiak has worked in the downtown area for over 35 years and moved to downtown eight years ago to shorten his commute.
Despite difficulties in finding parking and the noise from construction, he said that the growth in downtown has generally been good. He said that he welcomes more housing in the area.
Of the increasing amount of college students, Yozwiak said that they bring a “whole new level of energy” to downtown.
“It helps to diversify the social fabric of the downtown area,” said Yozwiak.
He said that in addition to the influx of students and young workers, older people are moving to the area as well, simply because it’s convenient.
“I can hop on one of five different freeways and go anywhere in the Valley within a half hour,” Yozwiak said.
Maya Rawn, 26, moved from Tempe to downtown Phoenix about two years ago.
“The only negative thing is that things get more expensive because it’s developing and becoming more popular,” Rawn said. “Some people can afford to stay and some people can’t. That’s pretty normal for a growing city.”
Rawn said that though it’s pricier, there are still many positives that come from the growth.
“It’s really beautiful. I’m really proud of Phoenix,” Rawn said of downtown Phoenix’s newfound sense of community. “It’s creating an environment where people are a lot happier.”
Yozwiak also said that the changes have largely been very positive for the area.
“Downtown has just blossomed,” Yozwiak said. “There’s a lot of smart people going to school here, and I think they all make for great neighbors.”
While occupied ground floor retail is ideal, I’d rather have leasing offices and fitness centers than empty ground floor retail. Those leasing offices and fitness centers can always be converted to retail space if there is sufficient demand in the future.
Considering the retail vacancy rate of downtown at the moment, especially in EC, you’d have to guess the demand is at its peak. Spaces that sat empty for years are now filled, including in new construction; Union and R-Pointe aren’t empty, so I don’t see any argument that Linear and/or iLuminate would be unable to lease a small commercial space for a gallery, boutique, or other arts/non-kitchen usage. I have never seen a conversion TO retail happen in urban Phoenix; many times, retail is converted to residential. Those gyms are fairly permanent and there’s no question that having 3+ of these on one intersection is a super awkward gateway to Roosevelt.
If demand is at its peak, the implication is that demand will go down from here. Under those conditions, the last thing the neighborhood needs is more retail space in the absence of committed tenants. Under those conditions, the vacant space is a form of blight far more injurious than fitness or leasing centers as it languishes for years on the market.
Besides, is retail demand really at peak? A mile to the north, the retail component of Tapestry has gone at least eight years with minimal activity. To the south, not a single retail space in the biomedical campus garage is occupied. Clearly, requiring or encouraging developers to build ground floor retail everywhere in pursuit of a rigid ideology that dictates every single building must be mixed use is not working. It would be far better to let market demand dictate the quantity and timing of new retail space.
As for the statement that you’ve never seen a conversion to retail from another use, I’d suggest taking a closer look at the surrounding neighborhood. Made Art Boutique and Bud’s Glass Joint both operate in buildings that were originally houses. On the west side of downtown, the same is true for Cibo and the Vig Fillmore. At Heritage Square, Nobuo at Teeter House, Pizzeria Bianco, and the Rose and Crown are all converted residential. Royal Coffee occupies a former carriage house. Up in Midtown, Taco Guild is in a building that was once a church. The same is true for the Great Arizona Puppet Theater and its puppetry store. Likewise, the Monroe Abbey is being prepared for potential retail use.
I could go on, but my point should be clear. Conversion from another use to retail is certainly possible — but only if market conditions dictate. While I have no doubt that you, Kimber Lanning, and other critics of Roosevelt Row development have the best intentions here, the pursuit of an overzealous application of a Jane Jacobs inspired fantasy hurts more than it helps. if retail arrives when it’s needed, it will enrich the neighborhood. If it’s mandated or incentivized by the city in the absence of demand, it will be far more “devastating” (Lanning’s exaggerated wording) than a few fitness centers.